Archive for November, 2009

Hugo Roy wrote an excellent post over at the FSFE fellowship blogs. While he says that there’s nothing new in what he’s writing, I’ll put another spin on it and say that some things can’t be repeated often enough. Such as software freedom, an issue that most people don’t care about and/or don’t understand yet. But once they run into enough of the problems that non-free software causes, they will care.

Hugo uses a nice comparison to democracy — while not everyone would run for an election, most people would probably still agree that the fact that they could and that democracy exists is a pretty comfortable thing.

Here’s an excerpt:

Anyone can run for an election, but it does not mean that everyone will. Because not everyone has the capacity or the will to become a politician. This being said, would you say that Democracy does not matter because you do not want to be in politics? I guess most people would not say that.

It’s the same thing with Free Software. Anyone can use, share, study and improve the program. But the fact that you will not do that, does not mean that it’s not important to you. It’s important for the whole system. And the more important the system becomes, the more valuable is that freedom.

Read the rest at Hugo’s blog.

omglol

Everyone has pet peeves. Mine often have to do with language. Let’s formulate rules about that!

Rule #1 of not making yourself look like a complete fool: If you have to postfix each and every one of your sentences with “lol”, at least insert a comma in the appropriate location.

Another huge disappointment from the US Patent and Trademark Office: They let Microsoft patent a feature that has been part of UNIX systems for almost 30 years (Original source: Groklaw). sudo allows you to execute a program with the privileges of the superuser (root, admin etc.). Also, remember that su (e.g. via su -c) has this functionality built in as well, just without the beautiful configuration options.

This should once again demonstrate why software patents are a dangerous, stupid thing.

8track_playerIn the very near future, your typical way of consuming entertainment could be so much improved, but only if Big Content stops barking up the wrong tree and works with us instead of against us.

It’s Saturday night and you have a two hour blank spot in your evening schedule. There’s a good film in theaters right now, but you don’t feel like going out and would much rather cuddle on the sofa and watch the same film with your significant other. What do you do today? You grab the thing off RapidShare or some BitTorrent tracker. The quality isn’t all that (it’s a telesync or a cam release, ewww), but you got it nearly for free and you didn’t need to move your butt anywhere.

How could the entertainment industry improve this situation and turn this into cash? By offering the same film to you at home, in Full HD, to be streamed to your TV for 10% more than the movie ticket would cost. Hey, you’d save that much by not having to buy drinks, popcorn and parking. Also, as opposed to the RapidShare solution, you could start watching right away and, let’s be generous and realistic, finish anytime in the following 7 days. Huge profit for the industry, and they can make even more if they use e.g. BitTorrent to spread content distribution onto all connected cable boxes of all subscribers of the service. That way they put some of the cost of scaling onto the customer instead of having to buy their own bandwidth. So their profits improve from two sides: Not having to maintain the cinema distribution chain for that particular view and not having to pay for all their own bandwidth as customers pay a significant amount.

This isn’t bullshit: Look at any decent HD torrent today and you can usually find a solid amount of seeders. My line at home isn’t particularly fat (10 Mbit/s), but BitTorrent can saturate it, and that means I get a good 8 GB HD rip in a bunch of hours.

Back to the future vision. Later on, when the film is out on Blu-Ray, you could buy a downloadable copy for e.g. 30% less than what the BD version costs. There’s no DRM on it, but that’s fine because the industry saves money by having to pump less funds into maintaining the phyiscal disc supply chain. They piss off the channel partners, but hey, life is tough. If you want to hear complaints about changing markets making jobs obsolete, talk to a blacksmith.

The same works for series or games: The earlier you want them, the more you pay. The later you buy, the more restrictions (e.g. DRM) are removed. With games you may even get bonus packages such as downloadable content included free with your purchase if you choose to buy later, e.g. a year after release. And while we’re mentioning DRM, it could of course be removed completely once there is enough bandwidth to stream HD movies or game assets on demand. You’d never even receive a fully copy of the film, just the instant you’re viewing at the time. If there’s no file in the customer’s hands, there’s no pressure to have DRM.

Now you’ll call me naive, you’ll say that the studios will never have enough common sense for such a simplistic solution, and that they don’t have balls big enough to go without DRM or put some part of the distribution system onto customers’ devices. At the moment you’re right. But in 10 years, we’ll be getting our entertainment in a way like I described, and all these problems will have been miraculously solved.

These are ideas that are perfectly possible to implement right now, today. Just like MP3 was the ‘current’ thing, not the future thing, for us techies 10 years ago. This means the entertainment industry will have caught up with our ideas in a decade. The question is whether these ideas, or the big label entertainment industry itself, are still relevant then. It’s for them alone to decide, and they have to decide today.

The physical retail channel for entertainment will go away sometime soon, butts all over the world will be more and more reluctant to move out of their comfortable sofa grooves, so the entertainment industry better wake up to these facts, stop playing the victim and start planning now.

Photo CC-By Randy Son Of Robert

It seems that Microsoft wanted to use some Free Software in their Windows 7 USB/DVD Download Tool, which they have now removed from their website to investigate the license violation. Taking FOSS code would be fine, no one would stop Microsoft from doing this if they would abide by the terms of the GNU General Public License under which the original code was published. In fact, I’d welcome it if Microsoft would stop their own silly suite of “open source” software licenses and just develop under the GNU GPL like they do for their Hyper-V drivers, but MS seems to be on some sort of holy war against the GPL.

Anyhow. So Microsoft took GPL code and incorporated it in their own CD downloader/writing utility (what the heck did the tool do in the first place?). This is still fine. But then they refused to give out the source to their modifications and they changed the license to be a more restrictive one. You cannot do that with Free Software under the GPL! You must license the code you took under the same terms as it was licensed to you.

I’m looking forward to see how this will play out. We’d all welcome Microsoft to the Free Software field, but my guess is that they wouldn’t be able to compete anymore if their software were Free Software. Also, they ought to have enough lawyers to understand the GPL, so perhaps the team behind the Windows 7 USB/DVD Download Tool should ask one next time they take some Free Software code.

Update: Microsoft have admitted their mistake and are now providing the source code to the tool, as the license demands. Congratulations for solving this the right way! And enjoy trying out the GPL. Maybe you’d like to shift some more projects to that license? ;)

Matthias Ettrich, the founder of the KDE project was awarded the Bundesverdienstkreuz (German Federal Cross of Merit) today for founding the project that created the Free Software K desktop environment. Specifically, the award was given “in recognition of his work spurring innovation and spreading knowledge for the common good”.

It’s good to see Free Software recognized on a national level — the Bundesverdienstkreuz is the only decoration given by Germany on a national level. KDE is a kickass desktop environment, certainly the most configurable and powerful one on any platform. Now let’s just fix a few more bugs and it’s ready to dominate the world.

Congratulations, Matthias :)

germ-swissian-flag1.png
Vor einiger Zeit habe ich mich über das deutsche Schwein geärgert, das in die Schweiz gekommen ist. Keine Angst, damit ist kein Deutscher gemeint, sondern das deutsche Wort Schweinegrippe, das in meinen Augen falsch verschweizerdeutscht wurde. Damals meinte ich es nicht wirklich ernst, konnte mir nicht vorstellen, dass deshalb auch das “schwii” einmal zum “Schwein” werden würde.

Gestern der Gegenbeweis. In einem Gespräch mit einem richtig schweizerischen Schweizer sagt er doch tatsächlich “und döt häts zwei schwein gha”. Werden wir jetzt Zeugen, wie ein Schweizer Wort ausstirbt? Spannend! Und alles nur wegen H1N1.

Dabei ist die Sache ja doppelt pervers: Der Plural von “schwii” ist “schwii”, in allen mir bekannten Dialekten. Der Plural von “schwein”, so wie das Volk dies jetzt nunmal konjugiert, ist auch “schwein”! Eis schwein, zwei schwein, drei schwein, vier schwein.

Die Deutschen werden irgendwann denken, wir sind total doof.

Some large Swiss publishers in the educational sector got together to put up this website:

http://fair-kopieren.ch/

(Google Translate version in English)

And Digitale Allmend (an organization involved in Creative Commons in Switzerland, among other things) picked the article apart, pointing out gross exaggerations, half-truths, fearmongering and accusations that Switzerland’s teachers are now all criminals:

http://blog.allmend.ch/2009/11/04/lehrer-muessen-keine-diebe-sein-offene-inhalte-fuer-die-schulen-anstatt-schutz-der-verlage/

(Google Translate version in English)

The Digitale Allmend finishes with the sentence:

A truly “fair” campaign would not only explain the views of the publishers, but discuss the current situation in a more comprehensive way as well as point out sustainable alternatives. Digitale Allmend demands that the campaign be thoroughly reworked according to the points mentioned. Digitale Allmend also demands that educational publishers produce more content under liberal licenses like Creative Commons, so that their works may be freely copied, distributed and used.

I agree :)

The Reg is posting a totally interesting survey that goes some way towards confirming what we’ve been saying since 1998 or so.

When the music industry wakes up and stops being the knee-jerk lawsuit-wielding political lobbyist it is right now, we might get some constructive discussions out of them and help them save their failing business model. The study shows that most people do not “pirate” music and, guess what, the paid-for listening and download services are actually used. By real people.

Once Big Content had removed their idiotic DRM schemes, people started trusting those services and signed up, happy to pay as much (or more) for music as they did when it mostly came on CD.

Why did we see this already in the 90s and the music industry still hasn’t realized it 10 years later? It is a slow behemoth, but even many indie labels seem to be late to the party, and those should be small and agile. Maybe if they replaced the old farts in charge of the music licensing bodies, they could move faster and at least be on time for the next media shift, whenever and to whatever that will be. It would be more useful for them than playing crybaby again when history repeats.